Skip to main content

Relics & attributed objects

Relic of St. Peregrine Laziosi

A small relic can carry a large burden of hope. Peregrine’s story explains why people facing serious illness seek his intercession—and why the Ohio object needs its own documentation.

Archival image

Full caption, source, licence, and changes below

Start here

The story, in brief

The shrine identifies a relic of Saint Peregrine available for prayer. For someone facing serious illness, the name may matter more immediately than the object’s size: Peregrine is remembered for a threatened amputation and a reported healing. Understanding the devotion begins with that person and story. [SRC-01; EX-01]

A saint associated with illness

The official biography explains the leg-healing tradition and his invocation by people with cancer. [EX-01]

A distinct Ohio object

The shrine identifies a Peregrine relic, but its public description does not specify the material or a certificate tied to it. [SRC-01]

Prayer and identification differ

A devotion’s meaning does not supply the missing history of a particular fragment. [SRC-01; EX-01]

Human verification is still pending. View the open checks.
Explore the chapters

Who was Peregrine?

Peregrine Laziosi came from Forlì and joined the Servants of Mary as a brother, not a priest. The official profile places his entrance around the age of thirty and describes his later life in his home city, including attention to poor people. He belongs to the history of religious service as well as to stories of healing. [EX-01]

The night before the proposed operation

The official account describes a severe leg wound that physicians believed required amputation. Before the planned procedure, Peregrine prayed before a crucifix, slept, and experienced a dream of Christ healing him. The account says the physician found him healed the following morning. It is a transmitted religious narrative, not a surviving modern clinical file. [EX-01]

Why people with cancer remember him

The Dicastery identifies Peregrine as a patron invoked against cancer. That established devotional association does not justify retroactively assigning a precise modern cancer diagnosis to his medieval wound. The story’s human point is the vulnerability of illness and the hope of being accompanied through it. [EX-01]

In the Christian understanding summarized by the Met’s history of relic devotion, saints are asked to intercede for others before God. The relic makes that remembered relationship tangible; it is not a medicine with a demonstrated dose or predictable clinical effect. [EX-02]

What Maria Stein identifies

The shrine’s collection page identifies a Peregrine relic in the chapel. The preserved source record does not give its material, relic class, inventory identifier, or item-specific authentication document. Calling it a bone, a piece of skin, or something from the healed leg would add a claim that the cited description does not establish. [SRC-01]

What his canonization establishes

The official profile records recognition of his cult under Paul V in 1609 and canonization by Benedict XIII on 27 December 1726. Those acts explain his Catholic status. They do not identify every object later distributed under his name or show that this particular Ohio relic played a role in his cause. [EX-01; SRC-01]

What would bring the object into sharper focus?

An inventory entry linked to the displayed container, the corresponding authentication document, and a custody history would help connect the shrine’s attribution to a particular material object. Until those are examined, readers can understand the devotion while keeping its material identity unresolved. [SRC-01]

Catholic reflection & discussion

Let the object open a larger question

Pause over what this object brings to mind: a person, a place, an act of devotion, or a question about the past. Let that curiosity guide a careful reading of both its history and its meaning.

These editorial prompts invite reflection on the article. They are distinct from Church teaching and the evidence findings.

Pause and reflect

  1. What draws your attention to this object, and what are you hoping to understand through it?
  2. How does the article distinguish the object's documented history from the meaning people give it?
  3. If an attribution remains uncertain, which questions about faith, memory or devotion would still be worth exploring?
Discuss with family or a group

Choose questions suited to your readers' ages and experiences. Anyone can pass or keep a response private.

  • Begin with a familiar family keepsake. What can an object help someone remember, and what would be needed to establish its history?
  • Choose one image or description in the file. Which things can you observe, and which would you need a source to know?

Questions people ask

Open any question for a fuller answer and its sources.

Is Peregrine’s entire body in Ohio?

The cited shrine description identifies a relic, not his entire body. The quantity and material should not be guessed. [SRC-01]

Was his illness definitely cancer?

His patronage is clear in the official biography, but the medieval leg-wound narrative is not a modern diagnostic record. The two points should be kept separate. [EX-01]

Does the relic promise a cure?

The source identifies an opportunity for prayer. It does not demonstrate that contact with this object guarantees recovery. [SRC-01]

Why is the object’s evidence verdict unresolved?

The missing material description and authentication history limit what can be said about the specific relic. They do not make Peregrine’s Catholic canonization uncertain. [SRC-01; EX-01]

What the evidence can establish

Evidence verdict: unresolved

Does Maria Stein Shrine identify a St. Peregrine relic in its current collection?

The shrine's official chapel page identifies a St. Peregrine relic available for prayer; exact material and authentication documentation remain to be checked.

Sources: [SRC-01]

Church or institutional status

Official shrine custody

Authority
Maria Stein Shrine of the Holy Relics
Scope of the finding
Current custody and veneration of the attributed relic.
Limits of the finding
Exact material and provenance are not public in the cited page.
Official sources
[SRC-01]

Sources and notes

Back to the overview

Source labels describe a document's type and role, not the strength of a claim. Where provided, notes explain its use, access limits, and outstanding checks.

Corrections and updates

  • Expanded this file with a sourced narrative, 6 chapters and 4 answers to common questions. The existing evidence verdict label and institutional status are retained. Independent human review remains pending.

Back to the overview
A source map for Relic of St. Peregrine Laziosi. Each finding is paired with the limitation recorded for the same source in this case file. Context only: this original diagram organizes the cited records. It is not evidence for historical, medical, or supernatural claims. Arrows connect each source finding to its limit; they do not represent a sequence of events.

Original Corpus Files graphic

ST PEREGRINE RELIC MARIA STEIN · SOURCE MAP

Follow each finding to its limit

Does Maria Stein Shrine identify a St. Peregrine relic in its current collection?

Relic of St. Peregrine Laziosi

  1. Maria Stein Shrine — Relic Chapel

    SRC-01

    What the source supports

    Identifies a St. Peregrine relic in the chapel collection.

    Limit of that finding

    Does not specify relic class, material, or authenticum.

Help check this record

Visitors can privately suggest a correction, recommend a stronger or contrary source, or submit a photograph they own. Nothing becomes public automatically; every submission is reviewed privately before any separate publishing decision.

Open the contribution desk →